Six months after Nigerians elected new leaders, the electoral commission (INEC) is yet to upload the detailed results of the elections on its website.
Nigeria held presidential and national assembly elections on February 23, while governorship and state assembly elections were conducted on March 9. As at August 18, however, only the final results of the presidential election (total votes scored by each candidate) had been uploaded by the electoral commission.
Even for the presidential election, details of votes scored in each state or local governments are yet to be uploaded by the commission.
For governorship and parliamentary elections, the electoral commission is yet to upload any results. Rather, it only published the list of the eventual winners of the elections.
Violating The Law
Publishing of results of an election is mandatory on INEC, which has the responsibility for elections across Nigeria except for local government elections.
Section 71 of the Electoral Act states that INEC “shall cause to be posted on its notice board and website a notice showing the candidates at the election and their scores, and the person declared as elected or returned at the election.”
It is not clear if INEC’s refusal to publish the detailed results has any link to the criticisms that trailed the election results. Over half of the election results are being challenged in court.
Also, The Situation Room, a coalition of 72 civil society organisations that monitored the elections, in its final report questioned many of the figures declared by INEC as the final results of the election.
“Data in the voters’ register, as well as results figures declared by INEC, threw up several glaring discrepancies that have yet to be explained. There were also differences between the number of accredited voters and the total number of votes cast in many polling units. In a similar vein, Situation Room observed that there was significantly more votes casts in the presidential elections than was cast in the National Assembly elections which took place simultaneously with the presidential election.
“Furthermore, a close scrutiny of the registration numbers given by INEC reveals discrepancies between the total number of registered voters announced before the election and the total number of registered voters announced by INEC during the collation in 30 of Nigeria’s 36 states,” the civic coalition said.
When contacted last week on the reason the results are yet to be uploaded, INEC spokesperson, Festus Okoye said, “the officials at the headquarters are yet to resume fully from the Sallah break. When they do by Monday, I would find out and get back to you, he added.
INEC’s inaction on the results has, however, been condemned by civil society groups
“Unfortunately, INEC (has) neglected to make public, detailed breakdown of the election results—including voided votes. This is part of a more worrying trend,” Idayat Hassan of the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) said.
“One of the most noticeable and avoidable missteps INEC has made following the 2019 election is its refusal to publish detailed election results on its website. Much like it did in 2007 general elections, INEC has only published national-level totals for 2019 presidential elections, choosing to keep sub-national results data hidden from public view.
“It is high time civic groups and the press start making use of the freedom of Information Act requests to compel INEC to publish full and detailed results data for all elections held since 2015,” Ms Hassan, whose group monitored the elections across Nigeria, said.
In his reaction, a lawyer, Monday Ejeh, said INEC’s inaction may be because there is no punishment for not publishing the detailed results.
Mr Ejeh said there are two types of laws: the ones backed with sanctions, and the ones not backed with sanctions. In other words, when the law says – if you do this, you would suffer this, that means there are consequences for it; and then, the ones without sanctions.
“Talking of sanctions, a sanction can be negative, for example, imprisonment, an option of fine and so on, or it could be positive, meaning if you do this, you would get this or be promoted.
“But, that section (mandating publish of election results) is just hanging, there are no sanctions attached to it. So, those who are interested in getting the result from the website, there is one option, to approach the court and seek an order of the court, mandating INEC to upload the result.
“You may reach them to know what their reasons are, although there is no excuse. That section mentions notice board and website, so, if INEC comes to say on all the voting centres, we pasted this result, it may suffice for posting on their notice boards, but the question is, does INEC even have a notice board
….commission partisan, uses APC members to write election results for Buhari – PDP alleges
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Sunday alleged that Frankland Briyia’s declaration of governorship ambition for Bayelsa State while in office as the Cross River State Resident Electoral Commissioner, REC, has exposed INEC as being partisan under the chairmanship of Prof. Yakubu Mahmood.
It also alleged that the development confirmed that the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, used APC members to write figures for President Muhammadu Buhari to win the February 23, presidential election.
The opposition party’s spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, made these claims in a statement in Abuja.
PDP maintained that “the manifestation of Mr. Frankland Briyia, the erstwhile Cross River state Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), as an All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship aspirant in Bayelsa state, while still in office, is a direct confirmation that the APC used its members to write figures for President Muhammadu Buhari in the February Presidential election.
“The party notes that Mr. Briyia’s governorship ambition on the platform of the APC, which he announced while still in the confines of his office as REC, amply exposed INEC as a partisan electoral umpire under the watch of Professor Yakubu Mahmud.
“The PDP states that the fact that President Muhammadu Buhari did not sanction Mr. Briyia, even after he brazenly announced his ambition right in INEC facility, betrays APC’s embedded interests in the commission, which manifested in the manipulation of processes related to the Presidential elections.
“The PDP invites Nigerians to note that INEC, in a recent statement, denied receiving any resignation letter from Mr. Briyia at the time he announced his governorship ambition.”
PDP also challenged Buhari to come out clean on the real reason he failed to sanction the Cross River REC in line with the law.
It also urged the President to speak out on allegations in the public space that his Presidency failed to sanction Briyia because of the role he allegedly played in favour of the APC in the Presidential election.
PDP, however, insisted that INEC must be sanitised, and called on the National Assembly to open a public hearing on the issue as well as effect amendments in the Electoral Act to check the appointment and retention of persons with political leanings as electoral officers as well as recommending stringent sanctions for infringements in that direction.